Talk:Artifact

Naming convention
A lot of these artifact collections have names that overlap items or people in the game. So perhaps we need to do something like Dacia Ultan (Artifact Collection) or something similar... -- Ciovala Talk 19:17, 5 February 2011 (CST)
 * Agreed. I think might start breaking these artifacts into sub-pages. Or at least Freemarch Artifact Stonefield Artifact, however for the list of these my mind wants to name them in the plural, means we're going to need Disambig template sorted.   Maygus  talk &bull; cont 19:19, 5 February 2011 (CST)
 * Any complaints with splitting artifact sections out into sub pages as mentioned above?   Maygus  talk &bull; cont 04:31, 11 February 2011 (CST)

A Map?
Do artifact always appear at the same place? If so,Should we do a Map with Pin point of where the artifact are? Or at least show a picture? Because some rare one, like the, is REALLY hard to find without looking around alot. (Its on the edge of the Iron Forteress, on a tiny thing, where you need to jump down to).--Rubius 17:31, 12 February 2011 (CST)


 * Maps are available. I would suggest do it on the item page itself and use the coords template for locations. For the majority of them, I wouldn't worry as they are in many many many multiple places. But the out of the way - hidden and hard to get ones - you can prob include a coords.   Maygus  talk &bull;  cont 20:07, 12 February 2011 (CST)

Rewards
It seems to me logical to add to the the artifact subpages (zone, invasion, etc.) information about the rewards for turning in a quest. Any thoughts on the formatting? I hate to tinker with all the subpages before a template or a general approach can be decided upon. Another column might be too cluttered but the information could be added below the description without crushing the other columns.

For users trying to decide which sets are worth completing with AH purchases, a list that indicates which ones give rewards of lucky coins or unique pets would be invaluable. Psiharis 07:36, 14 March 2011 (UTC)


 * I was planning to start creating pages for individual artifact sets and then have the set names in the zone tables to redirect to that set (currently they send you to a page with the name of the set, even if that page has nothing to do with artifacts). On the set's page I was going to include known rewards (won't be able to do so for all, as I've turned in dozens that I didn't take note of the exact rewards for). But also including the notable rewards on the tables sounds pretty swell.


 * Did some thinkin on your suggestion, and I'm thinking of putting whatever reward as an icon (with the item's tooltip on mouseover) that links to the item's page, on the right of the description. the experimental type two template I made for the invader's page didn't seem to clutter the table too much, so I think it'll work out for the type one template as well. The invader artifacts don't have notable rewards, so the type two won't need a fifth column. I'll throw it on my to-do list


 * Also, me and my artifact collecting buds unanimously agree that all artifact sets reward exactly one lucky coin, or at least to the limits of our collecting has shown. nobody has completed special sets yet, though (the zone sets that take ten rares, for example, and the dead simon one is another special case)