Category talk:RIFT Patches

Layout Proposal (COMPLETE)
I propose that we layout the patch pages as such.
 * Category:RIFT Patches
 * Subcategory:RIFT BETA Patches

This way they are seperate and kept as such for posterity. They should also be protected once retail lauch hits. We should also start to discuss a layout for presenting them that is more user-friendly, for those that aren't familiar with Mediawiki software. -- Ash  fang  17:09, 20 February 2011 (UTC)
 * I agree about the patch subcategory. However, what is wrong with the layout?  The patch information is currently presented in a better way than official notes are... -- Ciovala Talk 18:33, 20 February 2011 (UTC)
 * I was thinking about something a little more like what Guild Wars Wiki has. (I can't link, it's blocked.)-- Ash  fang  19:03, 20 February 2011 (UTC)
 * They basically have them setup by date, and not by patch number, although we could always do a hybrid system. -- Ash  fang  19:04, 20 February 2011 (UTC)

As of Feb 21st, all beta patch notes have been backed up and recorded. Ash fang  20:32, 21 February 2011 (UTC)